𝐇𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐀𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐈𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞—𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞

On local social media, a familiar set of anonymous accounts reliably surface to defend City Hall and discredit its critics, consistently attempting to dominate political debate.

These aren’t everyday residents protecting their privacy and offering thoughtful insight; they’re digital enforcers who appear when scrutiny gets uncomfortable, hurling hostile accusations and stirring up controversy.

Hiding behind a false identity in this way undermines constructive dialogue, corrodes the integrity of public conversations, and deters others from speaking up.

If you’re calling someone corrupt or questioning their character, you must have the integrity to own your words. Otherwise, it’s just a smear campaign built on desperation, rather than truth.

KCU speaks up publicly to demand transparency, better governance, and to protect the public’s right to ask questions of their city hall.

In other communities, questions receive answers. Here, they receive silence.

We must ask why that is.

When did asking for good leadership become controversial—or turn into a threat?

Lately, some anonymous voices appear with uncanny timing to defend city hall decisions, deflect criticism, and discredit dissent—while elected officials stay silent.

This pattern speaks for itself.

If you believe in your words, sign your name. If you can’t, it could be that your conscience is trying to tell you something.